Author: sten Date: 2006-07-30 09:51:09 +0200 (Sun, 30 Jul 2006) New Revision: 1659 Modified: crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/Pkgfile crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/README Log: amarok: update dependencies and README Modified: crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/Pkgfile =================================================================== --- crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/Pkgfile 2006-07-30 06:58:48 UTC (rev 1658) +++ crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/Pkgfile 2006-07-30 07:51:09 UTC (rev 1659) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ # URL: http://amarok.kde.org/ # Maintainer: sten, nick dot steeves at shaw dot ca # Packager: -# Depends on: kdelibs, kdebase, xine-lib, k3b +# Depends on: kdelibs, kdebase, xine-lib, k3b, ruby name=amarok version=1.4.1 Modified: crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/README =================================================================== --- crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/README 2006-07-30 06:58:48 UTC (rev 1658) +++ crux-2.2/ports/opt/amarok/README 2006-07-30 07:51:09 UTC (rev 1659) @@ -10,16 +10,13 @@ xine-lib (recommended) * Xine is faster then GStreamer. Amarok's graphic equalizer, and other - visualizations, are tuned to Xine for low-latency. + visualizations, are tuned to Xine for low-latency. As GStreamer + isn't part of CRUX anymore, this is the only stable engine + available to CRUX users. -AND/OR +ruby (recommended) + * many amaroK scripts are written in Ruby, therefore Ruby is useful + for extending amaroK's usefulness -gst-plugins (optional) - * Use GStreamer instead of Xine, if desired. Personally, I find - that Xine is faster and more stable. - -libvisual-plugins (optional) - * LibVisual provides audio visualization support. Very nice eye candy! - k3b (optional) - * needed for cd-burning integration + * needed for integrated cd-burning