Hi contrib team, Today's cruxbot announcements, after recent commits marking several ports unmaintained, finally drew a reaction from the onlookers in IRC. I can hardly blame r0ni and frinnst for expecting more discussion of these neglected ports, the way it used to be done in previous years (either preceding or immediately following the commit that drops them or changes their maintainer line). Here's a sample of past threads on this list, in which the retiring maintainers tried to find someone to take over their unwanted ports. September 2007 (Mark Rosenstand) March 2008 (James Mills/prologic) July 2009 (Lucas Hazel) April 2010 (Jose Beneyto/sepen) June 2010 (Victor Martinez/pitillo) May 2014 (Bartlomiej Palmowski/rotwang) February 2018 (Svyatoslav Mishyn/juef) August 2019 (Alexandr Savca/chinarulezzz) In some of these threads it was considered "overkill" to list the unwanted ports on a separate Wiki page, because new maintainers could so quickly be found among the replies to the thread itself. But the latest batch of neglected ports has been on a different order of magnitude. So I've set up the Wiki page https://crux.nu/Main/OrphanedPorts to document the status of these ports (some already marked unmaintained, others yet to be acted on). I'd appreciate any feedback on this list. Better yet, those who have {Wiki,contrib,opt} access can just make their changes directly. That trail of documentation should satisfy r0ni and frinnst's puzzlement at the lack of discussion around non-trivial changes to the ports tree. Best regards, John