June 2008 - crux-devel - lists.crux.nu

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 22 Jun '08

22 Jun '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/avahi Url: http://avahi.org/download/avahi-0.6.22.tar.gz Reason: curl: (7) couldn't connect to host State: New Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/imagemagick Url: ftp://ftp.imagemagick.org/pub/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.3.9-0.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (19) Given file does not exist State: Reminder Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/libdaemon Url: http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/libdaemon/libdaemon-0.12.tar.gz Reason: curl: (7) couldn't connect to host State: New Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

Re: [crux-devel] 64-bit test run
by Bartek Palmowski 21 Jun '08

21 Jun '08

Hi crux64 looks promissing, and I'd me more than happy if I could help with project. I already have done some initial testing and must say crux for 64 bit processors is in demand. If I may suggest an idea to add variable to pkgmk.conf like ie. ARCH_HOST=64, which would make easier "architecture type" extraction. regards Bartlomiej Palmowski

3 2

crux64
by Jose V Beneyto 21 Jun '08

21 Jun '08

Hi, I don't have 64 boxes, but maybe in the near future or at office, and surely I'll be really interested on knowledge about it and reading these last messages. ATM CRUX is targeted for 686 systems, so I would propose you to move all 64 related mails to his mailing list [1]. What are your opinions? Best regards, Jose V Beneyto References: [1] http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux64

2 1

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 21 Jun '08

21 Jun '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 21 Jun '08

21 Jun '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/core/net-tools Url: http://www.tazenda.demon.co.uk/phil/net-tools/net-tools-1.60.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (28) connect() timed out! State: New Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

64-bit test run
by Johannes Winkelmann 20 Jun '08

20 Jun '08

Hi there, As recently pointed out by Fredrik [1] the demand for 64-bit OSes is only getting bigger, and as more and more of us have access to 64-bit hardware it would be nice to work towards an official crux 64-bit port. To prepare for this, we've discussed about the possible ways to manage ports, and came up with the following suggestion: - we'll keep separate core-x86_64.git and opt-x86_64.git - we'll add post commit hooks to all repositories, allowing to track changes to a port easily - ports will appear in opt-x86_64.git because they have a maintainer on this platform, not because they're in opt.git In other words, there won't be an automatic way to merge changes, however in most situations updates should be straight forward anyway, and for the rest I'd suggest to write a script which fetches the primary port, and runs some merge tool. I also suggest that we use the term "primary maintainer" (tracks upstream & makes the call whether a release should be used in CRUX, equivalent to the current maintainer) and "arch maintainer" (tracks the primary port). Being an arch maintainer should be a lot less work, and might in the future also be a good way to get into CRUX. In order to get things going, it would be nice to hear how many of you would be willing to help on this project. We can probably start with one of the existing 64-bit versions, so the initial release should be ready fairly quickly. More interesting would be to get a feeling what the costs of maintaining ports on two platforms are. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks, Johannes [1] http://crux.nu/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=280 -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@smts.ch Zurich, Switzerland http://jw.smts.ch

5 10

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 20 Jun '08

20 Jun '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0

Potentially broken source downloads
by crux＠crux.nu 20 Jun '08

20 Jun '08

Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/libjpeg Url: ftp://ftp.uu.net/graphics/jpeg/jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz Reason: curl: (67) Access denied: 530 State: Reminder Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/lsof Url: ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/lsof/lsof_4.80.tar.bz2 Reason: curl: (8) This doesn't seem like a nice ftp-server response State: New Port: /home/crux/git-to-rsync-working-copy/crux-2.4/opt/psutils Url: ftp://ftp.enst.fr/pub/unix/a2ps/psutils-1.17.tar.gz Reason: curl: (67) Access denied: 530 State: Reminder Full report: http://crux.nu/files/check_urls.html

1 0

prtverify daily results
by crux＠crux.nu 19 Jun '08

19 Jun '08

Differences since last check: (no differences) Full report: http://crux.nu/files/prtverify.log

1 0