May 2009 - crux-devel - lists.crux.nu

[PATCH] Do not attempt to build a package if the resulting file can't be written.
by Antti Nykanen 15 Jul '09

15 Jul '09

--- pkgmk.in | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/pkgmk.in b/pkgmk.in index 9fdf768..de50c95 100755 --- a/pkgmk.in +++ b/pkgmk.in @@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ remove_work_dir() { build_package() { local BUILD_SUCCESSFUL="no" + + if [ ! -w "$TARGET" ]; then + error "'$TARGET' is not writable." + exit 1 + fi make_work_dir -- 1.6.2.4

4 3

Changes for system/iso.git 2.5
by Matt Housh 25 May '09

25 May '09

Tilman asked me to post a diff of my changes, so here it is. These are the changes I made to get the updated ISO working with 2.6.29.3, new busybox, etc. Matt

3 2

Ship core fonts on the 2.6 iso?
by Tilman Sauerbeck 11 May '09

11 May '09

Hi, Juergen and me have begun some preparations for the 2.6 release (there's a todo list in the wiki at http://crux.nu/Wiki/TODO26) For our xorg ports, I've removed a couple of ancient modules that aren't in use anymore. I'm also considering shipping xorg without any core font packages (ie, drop the following packages from the iso: xorg-font-adobe-100dpi xorg-font-adobe-75dpi xorg-font-alias xorg-font-bh-100dpi xorg-font-bh-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-100dpi xorg-font-bitstream-75dpi xorg-font-bitstream-vera xorg-font-cursor-misc xorg-font-misc-misc A 'fixed' font and cursor fonts are built into libXfont these days, so -cursor-misc and -misc-misc can safely be removed. IMO shipping bitstream-vera suffices for the iso -- if users wish to use core fonts like -bitstream-100dpi they can install those from ports. Objections? Thanks, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

2 2