Hi,
I think the time has come to normalize maintainer/packager
information, expecially regarding core ports.
As you'll remember, for 2.2 we simply left Per as a maintainer
and replaced his email with core-ports at crux dot nu.
My proposal:
- Keep Per as the packager for inherited core ports,
with his personal email.
- Use the "real" packager for newer ports (ie udev)
- Use "CRUX System Team, core-ports at crux dot nu" for
the core ports maintainer field
- Use the specific maintainer for core ports that the
System Team members are not much interested in due
to personal preferences, if any (I'm thinking of
ports like xfsprogs)
Comments are welcome.
Regards,
Simone
