- crux-devel - lists.crux.nu

[clc-devel] jikes
by Tilo Riemer 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

Hello, I have the wrong footprint fixed, see here for the port: http://www.iapp.de/~riemer/CRUX-Ports Best regards, Tilo

1 0

[clc-devel] Hello and new ports...
by Tilo Riemer 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

Hello list, I have created two ports for CRUX, jikes (fast java compiler from IBM) and galculator (a scientific calculator based on GTK2). You can download they here: http://www.iapp.de/~riemer/CRUX-Ports/ Best regards, Tilo

2 2

[clc-devel] new realplay
by Emil Österlund 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

This one works fine. i put the rpm on my site. is that ok? regarding to copyright and stuff. /E

1 0

[clc-devel] Port updates
by Johannes Winkelmann 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

Hey everyone, after rejecting the 2nd non-member post with updated ports from unmaintained I'm wondering whether we should make a note on clc.berlios.de about our policy regarding updating ports. IIRC the basic idea was to keep unmaintained untouched and only change contrib... I know this didn't work (I have myself updated unmaintained ports at times to make the build again), but I'm not a fan of accepting changes against unmaintained before we have guidelines for submitting them (what to include, format etc). I guess it's time to remember Markus' mail [1] and consider dropping unmaintained completely. We have three kind of ports right now: 1. contrib 2. unmaintained (but updated) 3. unmaintained and forgotten I see basically two approaches: a) we allow external contributors to send back their changes (which will require a well defined procedure) b) we move port in 2. into our personal httpup repos and invite everyone to participate ports using httpup as well, covering all ports which are currently in unmaintained and updated at times. Like this, we only loose those ports which aren't in use. We should then probably consider a better way to list httpup repos, maybe even searchable; maybe a little repo browser tool in Ruby? To me, this is just a discussion about the idea behind CLC; to me, it is to provide good ports, therefore I'm all in favor of Plan B :-) Comments appreciated Best regards, Johannes References: 1 http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/clc-devel/2003-October/000141.html -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Biel, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net

1 0

[clc-devel] grip Pkgfile
by Carlo Ghiggi 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

A updated port for grip. regards /Carlo -- X-Mailer: Mutt/1.4.1i on CRUX 1.3 GNU/Linux box | LinuxMachine 204914 Progetto CRUX Italia: www.crux-it.org GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0x75A9985F on keyserver.linux.it

1 0

[clc-devel] pkgs
by Emil Österlund 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

A updated port for realplayer. It automaticly downloads the source and has dependencies. /Emil

2 1

[clc-devel] fceu
by Emil Österlund 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

A working package for FCEU wich is a nes emulator. /e

1 0

[clc-devel] new release numbers?
by Martin Opel 13 Dec '03

13 Dec '03

Hi everybody, I discovered at least two ports, which need a recompile after update: apache and ruby and all other ports which where linked to libgdbm. We should increase the release number of these two ports, so everybody knows the need for a recompile. Two more questions: who wants to maintain the mozilla port in the future? And what will we do with the mozilla-flash-plugin? One port with files for firebird and mozilla or one port for mozilla and one port for firebird? Bye Martin -- martin opel / fachbereich informatik - fachhochschule regensburg / email: martin.opel(a)informatik.fh-regensburg.de / web: http://rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de/~opel/ / phone: +49 941 943-1336, fax: +49 941 943-1426

3 3

[clc-devel] 1.3 status
by Per Liden 06 Dec '03

06 Dec '03

Hi all, No big problems have been found with the 1.3-test1 ISO so I'll release that as 1.3-final. It looks like most (at least a lot of) clc/contrib ports has been updated to work with 1.3 so I'll upload the 1.3 ISO to the CRUX ftp and make an announcement as soon as some mirror also has it. /Per

2 2

[clc-devel] Ports servers security
by Logan Ingalls 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

Not that we're as large of a target for hackers, but one of Gentoo's central rsync servers was hacked yesterday: http://lwn.net/Articles/61229/ I figured this might make a good time to ask: "How secure are cvsup.fukt.bth.se and crux.fh-regensburg.de?" Logan

4 3