On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 05:23:48PM +0100, Giulivo Navigante wrote:
Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Hi there,
I know that the PPC team as well as Peter Banks who took over the sparc port are reading this, so let's start discussion issues related to ports management. I think it's important to first agree on a goal for this, and cover the technical details later if there's a consensus. Also let me state that this is my personal opinion only, not the one of CLC or the CRUX project.
My goal is to have a system with the following properties:
1. The user only gets ports tested on this platform
i think this is very difficult to realize and not useful... infact $ARCH developers should perform a test for every known port and this is not acceptable specially for little communities
I have to full agree with Johannes here. For me it's not acceptable to have untested ports in a 'official' ports tree. Quality should go over quantity. regards Jürgen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux