It's been over two weeks since I opened ticket #37. I still haven't heard back from Jaeger. The impact of the name change of libgsf, to gnome-libgsf is minimal. Affected ports are: contrib/librsvg maol/gnome pazo/planner The slim version of libgsf only depends on glib, and libxml2; and is far more appropriate as a dependency of libwv2. The only issue I can think of, is that of a user who decides to rebuild all installed ports. His current libgsf would be replaced by the new/basic libgsf, which might cause other GNOME packages to fail. I would imagine that a user who would rebuild their system "for the fun of it" or "for new optimizations" would also be knowledgeable enough to post a ticket or message to the mailing list? He would then be made aware of the change to gnome-libgsf. Can I go ahead and: 1. cp libgsf to gnome-libgsf 2. commit my basic libgsf 3. email maol and pazo to tell them about the changes ?? Nick