![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4555f0eecba0a107be40064984798e61.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 01/04/12 21:07, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Dear CRUX developers,
Having the latest and greatest version of ports is the second most important reason I've been using CRUX since almost two years now, starting with one laptop, then a HTPC and finally a router/firewall. Like many others, the main reason is CRUX's utmost simple and elegant design.
I'm aware that CRUX developers' team is rather small, that some people may be busy with real life and that they offer their work for free. Please understand that I am *not* complaining in any way, I'm just willing to share some thoughts that may help to facilitate the time consuming, not always exciting task of packaging.
If some ports are behind the latest versions, I would imagine that's because CRUX is lacking manpower. On the other hand, I understand that CRUX can't accept any random user as a developer. Most of the time, I've been updating ports by myself, on my machines, but I think it's rather sad that 1. it can't benefit the whole community 2. it's a duplicate effort as sooner or later, the official maintainer will update those ports. I've been posting few patches on IRC or sometimes sent them to maintainers by email but that is not always efficient because if you're too busy to update your ports, you're most likely too busy to review others' patches too. So I've been thinking about the following:
What would you think about the creation of a community-patches-queue git repo accessible by, well, CRUX community. This is how it could work:
1. User U has updated port P on his machine, he would then commit a diff patch to community-patches-queue (we could also make a ports repo out of it and encourage people to use and test those ports but that's another story) 2. One (or more?) CRUX developer, available at that time, would volunteer to review and sign-off the patch. 3. Signed-off patches are sent to the official maintainer (or committed to community-patches-acked) so he could review and apply them or just apply them with peace of mind if he's too busy to review them fully (or even let other devs apply them?)
Maybe that sounds too complicated for temporary situations but what I can I say is that I'm willing to help (and I'm not the only one, for sure). Sending patches to community-patches-queue would be a way to do so.
Thanks in advance for your comments and wishing you all a pleasant Sunday.
Cheers, -- Emmanuel _______________________________________________ crux-devel mailing list crux-devel@lists.crux.nu http://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux-devel Hello Emmanuel,
I have done something smiler recently I forked the xorg repository and updated nearly everything except a couple of ports that would break things, if I post the site here it'll get this email spam filtered, it's been on jaegers irc log a few times. I've thought of doing the same for opt and perhaps contrib, but I would only be bumping stuff that I would be confident to do so. I am in opt so I guess I am a dev now, I would welcome some system system for more community involvement. I have a version sort i'm working on as well to track port versions, I knwo there is ck4up and other tools out there. But this program i am working on has more uses than just a version list-er. p.s. site is at romster dyndns org Regards, Danny Rawlins Romster @ freenode