On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:54:01PM +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 23:05:39 +0400, Anton wrote: [...]
If you think that w/o splitting and debugging changes the patch would be far smaller, you are very wrong. I don't really have an interest in discussing this to death. We just expect large patches to be split into smaller patches, each introducing a single change (pretty much like the linux kernel development works).
If you submit a reasonably split set of patches we'll definitely take the time to review and discuss it, or point out when a patch violates the "one patch, one feature" rule.
Attaching splitted patchset. Necessary for buxfixing: pkgutils-1-debug.patch pkgutils-2-bugfix.patch Not necessary: pkgutils-3-split.patch pkgutils-4-cosmetic.patch pkgutils-5-changelog.patch If you'll decide to reject debug patch, then patch 2 must be rewritten. Typedefs are used. Unfortunatelly I don't have much intentions to got headaches cause of using unnamed types. -- Anton (irc: bd2)