1 Jun
2006
1 Jun
'06
5:27 p.m.
Daniel Mueller wrote:
I've never heard about 'OpenPAM' before. But I'm sure the work effort needed to integrate it is most likely the same. Using OpenPAM instead of Linux-PAM doesn't feel right anyway.
bye, danm
So you've never heard of it, but you're willing to guess it's equally as taxing to implement, and that guess should satisfy the rest of us, and its name alone is enough to dismiss it? Please be more reasonable about this PAM issue. -- Jay Dolan jdolan.dyndns.org A: Because it's annoying to read. Q: Why is top-posting bad? A: Top posting. Q: What's the most annoying thing about usenet?