Hello, Johannes. On Mon, 29 May 2006 14:19:04 +0200 Johannes Winkelmann <jw@smts.ch> wrote:
I would also like to see the discussion on services privileges separation, FHS compliance. I used Juergen's ports to make FHS like ports of apache, mysql, vsftpd with opportunity to create separate users for each... It works, so why not? Well, "it works" is a rather weak argument, since "it works" already now. Can you give us any convincing argument why you think CRUX would benefit from (full) FHS compliance?
It is not hard to follow FHS rules, but ports creation for many software projects would be easier following this way, it also brings some more systematization (and solves ambiguity sometimes too). I can't really see drawbacks here. Other people might have more important reasons to want this, while mine are mostly theoretical. -- Mikhail Kolesnik ICQ: 260259143 IRC: mike_k at freenode/#crux, rusnet/#yalta Jabber: mike_k@jabber.lafox.net NIC handle: MKK83-UANIC