![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2cf60301f16bb8ae417fa3f5f076b232.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Simone Rota wrote: [...]
If I remember well it took some time to upgrade the clc port tree during the 1.1 > 1.2 transtion, was it only a matter of overloaded maintainers or there where technical issues?
I know I'm not a "historical one," but it took me a long time because my computer is slow; which is probably why I rushed to check-in all the changes once everything was built. Last time, Matt had already built a lot of the GNOME ports before I'd even gotten started, so he tagged them--and I felt relieved (thanks again Matt). Anyway, I like the thought of having a machine dedicated to building the ports and notifying us when something doesn't work right. With something like that setup, we would probably only need a few days to get everything fairly well in line--with the right timing and a pre-release, we might even be able to get the ports tagged in sync with the release. (Not that I've ever had a problem, really, with the way things are now). BTW, it was Thanksgiving here in the States and I ate /really/ well and I thought I'd share that with everybody :-P -- Robert McMeekin <rrm3@rrm3.org> http://www.rrm3.org/