![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/10a3ceea7f0886152bd6ee6fb28b3579.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
13 May
2007
13 May
'07
2:17 p.m.
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:31 +1000, Lucas Hazel wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 03:16 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
When you git-pull does it mention a non fast forward branch?
Nope. Fresh clones are outdated as well, the only branch being master and the only commit being 3e1f2e78e940b42761977d620d5051d7db1200d0 ("initial import" by Per Lidén) Am I the only one with this problem?