16 Sep
2004
16 Sep
'04
6:21 a.m.
I'd like to ask for a few more comments on this question, since the symlink variant has still a higher success rate compared to the wrapper solution.
/usr/share/gcc-wrappers/{distcc,ccache}/{gcc,g++} /usr/lib/gcc-wrappers/{distcc,ccache} ?
I've been using a symlink in ~/bin, but I agree, a system-wide solution would be better. I propose /usr/lib/{distcc,ccache}/bin since this would have the same structure as already existing ports (j2re, ant, db3...) Additionally it seems a bit more FHS-like than gcc-wrappers. // Jukka