Simone Rota wrote:
I prefer to only list the opt / base / contrib ports too. But this way we could "loose" ports from people not interested in partecipating to the new contrib. I'm perfectly ok with it, but just in case we can consider a dedicated (wiki?) page listing just the urls of additional repos, to show that there's life outside clc/crux :)
The advantage of including all httpups in the database is that you have one point where you can search for ports in the whole CRUX-universe. I suggest something like a checkbox "exclude httpups" in the search mask. Or favoring CLC-ports in the search result list. I agree with the idea that the portdb on the CRUX/CLC website should only list CRUX/CLC ports. But from the point of view of an average user it is annoying to have two databases or actually none for httpups. Regards Till -- http://www.tbmnet.de