![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/73a8f5105a881a41b5fe876b1ca926fc.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:43:13 -0800, Jay Dolan wrote:
--- Simone Rota <sip@varlock.com> wrote:
Hi Juergen,
I like option 3 :) Seriously, I think committing now is a good idea, also because it's one less thing we have to care for 2.1
Regards, Simone
-- Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip@varlock.com
I agree as well - it would be best to take care of it as soon as possible. A README notifying people to:
prt-get update `prt-get dependent python`
Or prt-get lock python, as an alternative. This leads me to another consideration: we could extend the commit guideline proposal to denote binary incompatible changes as well, to enable tracking of those. And - as discussed on IRC - we could trigger e-mails with a CVS post commit hook, checking for the few keywords (security, binary incompatible) and sending out a warning to a dedicated CLC commit-info list. Any opinions on this? At least for me, it would be helpful to have such additinal information available easily. Kind regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net