On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:53:29PM +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Also, it seemed to me that it would be clearer to the user to see that base and opt is on the CD. If only a subset of opt is on the CD, there's some kind of implicit partitioning of 'opt' anyway; expressing that with two collection names (which have the same historical meaning as opt/contrib now) would make that even more clear.
That said, I'm really fine with either solution, but wanted to add these arguments to clarify my initial posting. I guess that we'll hear more opinions from other CLC guys as well, so let's wait a bit before we count votes :-).
Personally I find the opt/extra separation a good idea. As you said, including only a subset of opt on the CD would be a bit confusing. And true, this would also make the transition to the new contrib repository easier. So my vote is on having opt and extra separated. :) - Jukka