On 13 February 2011 08:16, James Mills
<prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:08 AM, James Mills
> It's not that we don't care, it's that CRUX is very simple and has
> very little architecture put into it. It is one of it's strengths and the
> very reason a lot of us use it. I use it for everything :)
I had a read through your slides and the concept is very interesting.
It could be really useful. I still feel though that CRUX's installation
is easy and simple enough and normally only takes me 5-10mins
to install (minus kernel configure/compile time).