Hi Johannes, On Tuesday 18 April 2006 2:59, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Also, what would the most appropriate name for this column be? "Ports"? "Current Ports"?
I'm not sure if the average distrowatch reader understands "ports"; I'd probably use "version in ports tree", but maybe that's too long.
I forwarded your email to Ladislav to ask about this.
------- #!/bin/bash
VERSION=2.2 BASE=/home/crux/svn-to-rsync-working-copy-$VERSION TARGET=/home/crux/public_html/files/ports-versions-$VERSION.list
prt-get --no-std-config \ --config-append="prtdir $BASE/core" \ --config-append="prtdir $BASE/opt" \ printf "%n: %v\n" > $TARGET -------
I like it. I'm not sure who notifies Ladislav of http://crux.nu/files/crux-$VERSION-packages.txt (or if there's an automatic mechanism in place for such notifications...), but would he (or the program ;-) also be willing to mention the ports-versions-$VERSION.list file to Ladislav?
The output could obviously be adjusted to whatever Ladislav wants.
I've asked him about this, and will keep you updated. Do you think that we can have a file online by the end of the week? Thank you very much for your collaboration and suggestions on this. Cheers, Nick