On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:20:09 +0000 Simone Rota <sip@varlock.com> wrote:
My proposal:
- Keep Per as the packager for inherited core ports, with his personal email. - Use the "real" packager for newer ports (ie udev) - Use "CRUX System Team, core-ports at crux dot nu" for the core ports maintainer field - Use the specific maintainer for core ports that the System Team members are not much interested in due to personal preferences, if any (I'm thinking of ports like xfsprogs)
I have no say in this, but IMO it's pretty useless to keep the original packager around, since he/she/it should never be contacted anyway. An alternative is to keep the packager around if somone feels it's needed for crediting or some such, but without listing the mail-adress, to add an obstacle to mailing the wrong person. Just my truely worthless 0.02€ // treach