10 Sep
2004
10 Sep
'04
11:16 a.m.
Oh well, On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 13:10:32 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 13:04:37 +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote: [...]
Note that this would mean that we wouldn't have GNOME in our tree anymore, since rrm3 isn't around. IMO this would be the right consequence when a maintainer leaves, and we shouldn't try to keep the ports around but to find a new maintainer for them. Clarification: The wording was a bit unfortunate; what I mean is: We should try to keep the ports around without having someone looking after them. "We shouldn't..."
I'll double check my next correction mail, promised ;-) Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net