On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:53:02PM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 15:39 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Mark Rosenstand [2006-09-15 15:33]:
non-existant, with the exception that the former get to wear a funny character in front of their IRC name. (On the other hand, they must really like it, since unlike most other project channels, they wear it all the time.)
Hint: you're helping noone by making comments like this.
Sorry, I'm just a bit annoyed by the thought that this could likely be one of the reasons some "developers" want to keep the seperation.
Clearly a dedicated "IRC police" team would prevent this - for me, it's hard to see the association between repo commit rights and ability to judge when someone is abusing an IRC channel. But obviously I'm ignoring the e-penis factor.
Mark, I'd suggest that you calm down a little bit. Finally you have to accept that you are not in the position to decide anything regarding CRUX beside not using it anymore. If you are not able to simply accept a clear statement like the one from Johannes, it would be better for all of us if you forbear posting to this list in the future. Jürgen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux