12 Dec
2003
12 Dec
'03
9:13 p.m.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:57:40PM +0100, Simone Rota wrote: Hi Simone, hi everybody [...]
I saw some port manipulates the .footprint file (ie ghostscript). Is this our standard way? (just to know)
I think, it shouldn't. The reason for doing this in the ghostscript port was, that I don't want it dependent on cups. I guess, many people needs ghostscript to view postscript and pdf files but don't need any printing stuff. And, to be honest, I'm a lprng fan ;) Greetings Jürgen -- juergen.daubert@t-online.de