On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 01:05 +0200, Simone Rota wrote:
1. Ok, apart from Wilber which is a temp thing, do you like the current style? I've also worked on punbb integration (last image) since there's been some request for a forum.
I like it, looks very nice. As far as the forum is concerned, I don't care one way or another. In my opinion it's just a matter of presentation. After all, we have mailing list archives, which would provide the same access to past information, just in a different format. I can go either way. Since the ML works well and the consensus seems to be anti-forum, we might as well stick with the current setup there.
2. Regarding content, I've ported most of the documents on the current CLC and CRUX websites, but there is more to do. Should we setup a working temp site somewhere to fill together the pages before we go live? (then we can transfer the db to the actual site).
Seems reasonable. I also like the subproject idea, probably needs a fair bit of planning.
3. Integration I briefly spoke with Johannes regarding the integration of the a bug tracker into the website. Will we use cvstrac for this? Other options?
I like cvstrac and we're all used to it. Might as well keep using it. It's easy to move, certainly, since it's mostly contained in an sqlite db. The only alternative that really catches my eye is trac, since it supports subversion, but cvstrac will do if we don't go that route. Trac has some annoying dependencies, if I recall correctly.
Another question is the ports database page: I suppose we should change it a bit to fit the new contrib (do we still want to list the external httpup repos not in contrib?)
Whether we use Till's or not (which seems nice, I've no objections to it), it would be nice to adapt it to sql or something since there's quite a bit of disk searching involved right now. If there are external repos that don't go into contrib, perhaps it's best not to list them on the CLC pages. After all, isn't part of the point of the new contrib to sort of centralize and list everything? That would be something like a new unmaintained or a second contrib outside of contrib... Perhaps it could be argued that maybe subprojects are needed there as well, like gnome or mythtv or xfce4 or kde ports, etc., but perhaps they'd be better of listed only in their subproject pages, if we go that route. Matt (jaeger@freenode/#crux)