Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:35:59 +0200, Jose V Beneyto wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a patch for listing 'Nice to have' dependencies with prt-get Sometimes I want to known these nice-to-have ports, but I'm not a bash guru and often I use large lines:a
Is there a formal definition of what the "Nice to have" field should contain? I'm aware that it's used in opt as well, but it seems that there's no official agreement what should be in there, or how it should be used.
yeah, it's not official, but imho isn't a bad feature to have ATM there are 2 populars metas (Optional and Nice to have) and I think it could be the moment for unify it. Also, it's transparent for the rest of ports nicetohave optional core: 0 0 opt: 10 0 xorg: 0 0 contrib: 10 13 Thanks for discussing this point. Regards, Jose V Beneyto