11 Jan
2006
11 Jan
'06
7:08 p.m.
--- Juergen Daubert <jue@jue.li> wrote:
Nice to hear that. If we don't run into much trouble here, even gcc4 is ok for me. My restraint are primary driven by the fact, that I see enough work to organize the whole process, and under that point of few the time plan suggested by Johannes isn't very relaxed.
Johannes, can you modify your gcc4 port to be a drop-in replacement for gcc3.x? This way, maintainers can start test-building their ports with minimal setup required. Jay Dolan Software Engineer, Systems Analyst Windmill Cycles, Inc. 508.999.4000 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com