dear Jurgen, i've understood the way to work of CLC with cvs; but i've not understood why a crux user have to re-install crux (the new version) to use the new ports even if he have upgraded his system. * juergen.daubert@t-online.de (juergen.daubert@t-online.de) ha scritto: | On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 11:47:28AM +0200, [slash] wrote: | | Hi Guiseppe, | | > I (and other italian crux users) think that isn't good to have two | > collection of contrib ports (1.1 and 1.2), because many crux users often | > upgrade the system by installing the new version of their packages then | > even if their system is marked "version 1.1" they have a system thet is upgraded | > like (or more than) a 1.2 ones. | | I'm sorry to say, but this shows me that you not really understand how | cvs and the tagging system we (CLC) use works. I'd suggest to read the | CLC cvs manual | | <http://clc.berlios.de/doc/clc-cvs.html> | | again and even look at Martin's fine cvs page at | | <http://rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de/~opel/crux/clc/> | | btw, it's a _MUST_ for every CLC ports maintainer to update to every new | CRUX release asap. | | regards | Jürgen | | | -- | juergen.daubert@t-online.de | _______________________________________________ | clc-devel mailing list | clc-devel@lists.berlios.de | http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-devel