* ncrfgs <ncrfgs@tin.it> [2004-07-07 23:18]:
On 07/02/04 2i1:27:14, Daniel Mueller wrote: [...]
Aside from this, I (personally) would like to know WHO actually plays with the CVS. I mean I know you, because I heard you in IRC & mailing lists and I saw some of your Pkgfiles etc. But who else is 'we' ?
The two users account would be for giulivo and me. Maybe rrm3, jaeger and you already know me.
Just to keep this thread alive until something happens, I confirm knowing them. (-; I know them as well, and judging from their past presence in the mailing
Hi, On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 19:56:14 -0400, Robert McMeekin wrote: list and IRC, it seems to me that they have yet to integrate better. There were some discussions about improvements they'd like to see, but I have never seen them actually implementing one of them (to have a technical instead of a political discussion) or accepting one of Per's or CLC's decisions. The more - as I already tried to point out in [1] - the tone of communication is on a level which hardly helps to raise my interest in their problems [not sure if this this can be said this way]. Sometimes it almost seems to me that they are not interested in CLC (as a project) itself, but just having our ports. I'm obviously not speaking for the CLC project; personally, I'm more than happy to have non-x86 ports at CLC (even though I don't believe in a CVS based solution ;-)), but at the current point in time I don't think giulivo or "ncrfgs" are good matches for our team. Best regards, Johannes References: 1. https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/clc-devel/2004-June/000499.html -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net