Hi, On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:11:03 -0400 Robert McMeekin <rrm3@rrm3.org> wrote:
I think that sounds like a good idea. Perhaps there should be some guidelines on who from CRUX PPC gets CVS access?
Interesting question. On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:41:10 +0200 Giulivo Navigante <giulivonavigante@tiscali.it> wrote:
can we have a "per user" account solution as it is for x86 maintainers?
As you should know we are guests (as before) on crux.fh-regensburg.de which is kindly hosted by Martin Opel/FH-Regensburg. So we cannot create one million user accounts. Aside from this, I (personally) would like to know WHO actually plays with the CVS. I mean I know you, because I heard you in IRC & mailing lists and I saw some of your Pkgfiles etc. But who else is 'we' ? Another topic: As far as I know it is not possible to specify more than one 'tag' in supfiles (/etc/ports/*.cvsup). If you use something like this.. -------------snip-------------- # Official contrib ports contrib tag=PPC-2_0 -------------snap-------------- .. you'll only get the PPC-2_0 tagged/branched ports. Are you willing to tag each port with 'PPC-2_0' after it got an update ? :-) What's about creating a new collection called .. hmm .. 'contrib-ppc' ? ---------------------------snip---------------------------- /usr/ports/base /usr/ports/opt /usr/ports/contrib <-- normal x86 stuff /usr/ports/contrib-ppc <-- ppc specific stuff [..] ---------------------------snap---------------------------- There is an useful tool around which supports multiple port directories. prt-get.conf(5) -----------------------------snip------------------------------- [..] The order of the prtdir options is important, as if a port is in multiple directories, prt-get will use the one found first (directories listed first have precedence) [..] -----------------------------snap------------------------------- Other suggestions, comments ? .oO(Said with hope to have shaken awake some more CLC members :-) bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany (OpenPGP: 1024D/126EC290)