![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a21a2b39bf7bcec3953d52a83d99ecd0.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 07/12/06 14:27 Anton wrote:
And I don't see ANY reasons why you're stop talking about crux and start talking about my personality and provoke me to answer the same. I'm asking the rest of CRUX'ers to sorry me about this email, I've *tried* to direct this shit in private, but Johannes want theatre.
Not sure about how this topic changed from a smileys-filled one into this, anyway, here's my take: Since some work on pkgutils-ng is planned, I think it makes sense to use a slighltly conservative approach regarding the current pkgutils. This means it's ok to fix known bugs in the current codebase, while unnecessary* changes and additional ideas would best fit into pkgutils-ng developement. Submitting small patches targetting specific bugs would make our job a lot easier and increase the probability of the patches to be applied. That's all, I really hope we all can chill down and work on current and future releases with more teamwork and less flames. Regards, Simone * where unnecessary != bad -- Simone Rota Bergamo, Italy - http://www.varlock.com