![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/6d9cfa47b02fe605d52f16450c1984ee.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:07:40AM +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Have you ever thought that your attitude might be one of the reasons that your patches don't make it upstream?
But really I don't get your rules. pkgutils is so small package, and I don't understand why you're playing bombastic big-packages games. Are you saying that only big-packages should be changed incrementally, while small ones should get radical make overs only? I fail to see the logic of this, sorry.
And why I have to apply so many forces to be heard in this small crux-world? Because all I see from you is complaining (pkgutils-ng),
Do you want to everyone will agree with you? Aren't you scared about that?
whining (depot patch) and stating how you are right, and I am wrong (this thread).
Are you flawless? Have anybody right to say that you're wrong? Is it so bad when someone says that you're wrong? Is it tragedy for you? Want to hear what I see from you as a maintainer? Nothing. I mean it. Zero, void, null, nil, zip. You've got one patch per half year, and you're refuse to review just one of them (I'm not saying about that patch only). As for own patches - you have none. You, as the maintainer, have made zero input to pkgutils's C++ part. And I don't see ANY reasons why you're stop talking about crux and start talking about my personality and provoke me to answer the same. I'm asking the rest of CRUX'ers to sorry me about this email, I've *tried* to direct this shit in private, but Johannes want theatre. -- Anton (irc: bd2)