[clc-devel] [PROPOSAL] drop opt/pine
Hello, I don't know anyone who's using pine(1) these days. Why not just drop it and add opt/mutt + opt/nano(as replacement for pico(1))? CRUX's userbase seems to grow continuously - I think we should at least support UTF8/Unicode in all 'major' programs (the latest CRUX CD comes with pine). bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [Clc-crux64] replace pico on nano? Date: Tuesday 25 April 2006 18:32 From: Виталий Бердинских <***.vitaly@***.kh.***.gov.ua> To: ***@lists.***.de Hello cruxers, hello Daniel! Propose add in distro nano and remove pico (for best Unicode support). -- Best regards, Vitaly mailto:***@users.***.net _______________________________________________ Clc-crux64 mailing list ********@lists.******.de http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-crux64 -------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 19:31 +0200, Daniel Mueller wrote:
I don't know anyone who's using pine(1) these days. Why not just drop it and add opt/mutt + opt/nano(as replacement for pico(1))? CRUX's userbase seems to grow continuously - I think we should at least support UTF8/Unicode in all 'major' programs (the latest CRUX CD comes with pine).
A better argument would be that those are free :)
Daniel Mueller [2006-04-25 19:31]: Hi,
I don't know anyone who's using pine(1) these days. Why not just drop it and add opt/mutt + opt/nano(as replacement for pico(1))? CRUX's userbase seems to grow continuously - I think we should at least support UTF8/Unicode in all 'major' programs (the latest CRUX CD comes with pine).
Sounds good to me. +1 etc. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:42:11 +0200 Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@crux.nu> wrote:
Daniel Mueller [2006-04-25 19:31]:
Hi,
I don't know anyone who's using pine(1) these days. Why not just drop it and add opt/mutt + opt/nano(as replacement for pico(1))? CRUX's userbase seems to grow continuously - I think we should at least support UTF8/Unicode in all 'major' programs (the latest CRUX CD comes with pine).
for me it's a good idea.. Regards, Alfredo -- eva-00 | GNU/Linux CRUX 2.1 Linux Machine #219842 LinuxUser #334493
participants (4)
-
alfredo -
Daniel Mueller -
Mark Rosenstand -
Tilman Sauerbeck