Daniel, I hope i speak for the most of us. We will miss you, and thank you so much for all your help! We hope to see you around the room. Regards, Jonathan "j^2" Asghar On 10/11/05, Daniel Mueller <daniel@danm.de> wrote:

Hi,

during the last weeks I came to the conclusion that I've not enough time for CRUX. We are a bit shorthanded at work and this situation will not change in near future (normal work time increased. :-(.

My home machine is an AMD64 and I'm running a clone of Jeremy's 64bit CRUX on it. I don't plan to upgrade my (x86) contrib ports for the next CRUX release (2.2). Actually, I'm happy that I'm able to keep the 64bit ports up-to-date (crux.danm.de/ports/ <http://crux.danm.de/ports/>). Don't get me wrong, CRUX is a nice hobby - but I don't want to spend all my free-time on it.

bye, danm

-- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A _______________________________________________ clc-devel mailing list clc-devel@lists.berlios.de http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/clc-devel

-- Jonathan Asghar phone: 512.619.0722

Hi Daniel, On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 22:20:28 +0200, Daniel Mueller wrote:

Hi,

during the last weeks I came to the conclusion that I've not enough time for CRUX. We are a bit shorthanded at work and this situation will not change in near future (normal work time increased. :-(. Perfectly understandable. Thanks for all the work you've done so far.

My home machine is an AMD64 and I'm running a clone of Jeremy's 64bit CRUX on it. I don't plan to upgrade my (x86) contrib ports for the next CRUX release (2.2). Actually, I'm happy that I'm able to keep the 64bit ports up-to-date (crux.danm.de/ports/) I we adapt a model similar to the one I proposed a while ago, arch maintainers on x86 will be able to benefit from your work on the 64-bit platform as well (at least regarding updates).

Kind regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net