Hi crux64 looks promissing, and I'd me more than happy if I could help with project. I already have done some initial testing and must say crux for 64 bit processors is in demand. If I may suggest an idea to add variable to pkgmk.conf like ie. ARCH_HOST=64, which would make easier "architecture type" extraction. regards Bartlomiej Palmowski
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:04:35 +0200 Bartek Palmowski <wszystkie.fajne.loginy.zajete@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
crux64 looks promissing, and I'd me more than happy if I could help with project. I already have done some initial testing and must say crux for 64 bit processors is in demand. If I may suggest an idea to add variable to pkgmk.conf like ie. ARCH_HOST=64, which would make easier "architecture type" extraction.
Why would that be a good idea? -- Lucas Hazel <lucas@die.net.au>
Bartek Palmowski [2008-06-21 02:04]:
crux64 looks promissing, and I'd me more than happy if I could help with project. I already have done some initial testing and must say crux for 64 bit processors is in demand. If I may suggest an idea to add variable to pkgmk.conf like ie. ARCH_HOST=64, which would make easier "architecture type" extraction.
What were playing with atm are separate ports trees for x86_64. So opt-x84_64/foo/Pkgfile will only be used on x86_64 and so there's no need to check the current architecture etc. I guess I should document the layout I have in mind in the wiki? Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
participants (3)
-
Bartek Palmowski -
Lucas Hazel -
Tilman Sauerbeck