Hi, This is mainly meant for Per and CLC maintainers, but in no way private: Let's see whether this "bug day" is a good thing: the idea is to focus on some more or less burning issues and discuss them in a separate IRC channel (we can always talk about our daily life in #archlinux ;-)). I added the items from the "roadmap" mail to a wiki page, online at http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/wiki?p=BugDayTm Please add/adjust this page at will. If you feel like discussing about those and other issues, please join #crux-bugday, from now until saturday. Kind regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net
Hey, the bug days are over, and I figured I'd post a short summary and comment on it: (if you'd like to read through the discussions, log files can be found at http://clc.morpheus.net/irc/index.php?channel=crux-bugday). First off all, I think we haven't managed to discuss all the items mentioned on the wiki page, but mainly because the hosting situation is not clear at all (on which many of the other tasks depend). Multiple efforts so resolve this are ongoing, or will start this week. The new contrib collection is online, and as you've probably read public testing should start soon, certainly within this week. The 'alias' discussion was not really extensive, but I guess we'll just introduce it and see how it feels, since it's completely restricted to prt-get at the moment. I plan to make a new release of prt-get later this week, or next weekend, incorporating the list of aliases. Jukka has provided lists of ports with broken sources, and broken dependencies (deps which are not in contrib): http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/wiki?p=BrokenSources http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/wiki?p=MissingPorts I you haven't done so, please check those two lists. Till Biedermann has given us an update on his work on a new port database, which will be fully integrated in the wiki. Finally, as a general impression, I liked the fact that it was a focused meeting and opportunity to discuss issues with multiple members of CLC. On the other hand, it was a bit long (three days) and we had too many items listed to discuss (well, we have many outstanding issues, but still). I'd like to hear different opinions, but in general, I'd consider it a good idea to do something like this more regularly, say once per month, and maybe "just" two days. Kind regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net
participants (1)
-
Johannes Winkelmann