My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 03:16 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
When you git-pull does it mention a non fast forward branch? Try using the -f switch. -- Lucas Hazel
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:31 +1000, Lucas Hazel wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 03:16 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
When you git-pull does it mention a non fast forward branch?
Nope. Fresh clones are outdated as well, the only branch being master and the only commit being 3e1f2e78e940b42761977d620d5051d7db1200d0 ("initial import" by Per Lidén) Am I the only one with this problem?
Mark Rosenstand [2007-05-12 03:16]:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
Nope, the repository didn't move. I suggest to re-clone with git 1.5 and then follow the git tutorial that I sent here some months ago to keep track of updates. Regards, Tilman -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:53 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Mark Rosenstand [2007-05-12 03:16]:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
Nope, the repository didn't move.
I suggest to re-clone with git 1.5 and then follow the git tutorial that I sent here some months ago to keep track of updates.
I've already tried that. Didn't change anything.
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:53 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Mark Rosenstand [2007-05-12 03:16]:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
Nope, the repository didn't move.
I suggest to re-clone with git 1.5 and then follow the git tutorial that I sent here some months ago to keep track of updates.
I've already tried that. Didn't change anything.
Really? $:> git clone git://crux.nu/system/iso.git $:> cd iso $:> git branch 2.3 origin/2.3 $:> git checkout 2.3 HTH Jürgen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 16:55 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:53 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
Mark Rosenstand [2007-05-12 03:16]:
My local copy of git://crux.nu/system/iso.git is very outdated and only has a master branch (at 2.1), while http://crux.nu/gitweb/?p=system/iso.git;a=summary seems to have a 2.3 branch and a lot of activity. Is the gitweb page showing a different repository?
Nope, the repository didn't move.
I suggest to re-clone with git 1.5 and then follow the git tutorial that I sent here some months ago to keep track of updates.
I've already tried that. Didn't change anything.
Really?
$:> git clone git://crux.nu/system/iso.git $:> cd iso $:> git branch 2.3 origin/2.3 $:> git checkout 2.3
Whoops, 1.5 has changed more than I expected. Anyway, it works now. Thanks for the help.
participants (4)
-
Juergen Daubert -
Lucas Hazel -
Mark Rosenstand -
Tilman Sauerbeck