[clc-devel] Policy for closing tickets
Hi all, This could sound stupid, but are we using some implicit rule for marking closed cvstrac tickets? I've always used the "closed" tag, but I see a lot of "fixed" lately. I feel fixed is more appropriate, shall we use closed for tickets that did not require intervention? (ie: http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/tktview?tn=28,4 ) Just a cosmetic issue, I know. Regards, Simone -- Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip@varlock.com
Simone Rota wrote:
Hi all,
This could sound stupid, but are we using some implicit rule for marking closed cvstrac tickets?
I've always used the "closed" tag, but I see a lot of "fixed" lately. I feel fixed is more appropriate, shall we use closed for tickets that did not require intervention? (ie: http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/tktview?tn=28,4 )
Just a cosmetic issue, I know.
Regards, Simone
Simone, usually, Fixed does not mean TESTED, so in many bug tracking systems FIXED -> CHECKED -> CLOSED is the stage progression. Fixed just means coder added code and addressed the issue. I think that's the way some common bugtracking systems work. Just my 2 cents. Victor
On 10/09/04 08:53 Victor wrote:
Simone, usually, Fixed does not mean TESTED, so in many bug tracking systems FIXED -> CHECKED -> CLOSED is the stage progression. Fixed just means coder added code and addressed the issue. I think that's the way some common bugtracking systems work.
Hi Victor, ...makes sense. Actually I had a quick look at a couple of bugtracking packages (trac and bloatz..ahem, bugzilla), they seem to separate the ticket status from its solution. I suppose this separation is to avoid confusing stupid people like me :-) Thanks for your reply, Regards, Simone -- Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip@varlock.com
participants (2)
-
Simone Rota -
Victor