[clc-devel] Fw: CLC maintainer ?
Hi, some time ago I've asked Nick Steevens whether he would like to become a CLC maintainer and join our team. He has a bunch of nice ports located here: http://members.shaw.ca/nick.steeves/ports/index.html The main reason why I've wrote him was that he could be a big help with KDE packages/ports (maybe he could overtake it completely..). He sent me a lot of patches and suggestions so far and I adopted nearly all of them. I'd like to see Nick in our team. You can find some information about him on his webpage: http://members.shaw.ca/nick.steeves Needless to say that I vote for his CLC membership :) bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany (OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A) Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:30:32 -0600 From: Nick Steeves <nick.steeves@shaw.ca> To: Daniel Mueller <danm@gmx.li> Subject: Re: CLC maintainer ? Hi Daniel, Well, my old Athlon motherboard finally died. A bit of debt later, and now I have a modern system. (Intel D865PERLX, P4 C 2.8ghz, 512MB PC400) Needless to say, it is a very fast system--and makes the debt worth it. :-) The reason that this is significant, is that I think that I can build KDE in 3 hours now. So I can get my initial build onto my system, test it, modify it for package standards, verify, publish...that much faster. Due to this phenomenal speed increase, predicted time for turning out a solid KDE release is six hours, rather then 18-20. To sum things up: do to two unfortunate circumstances (hardware failure and debt) I now have the time necessary to be able to commit to a development position within the CLC! My biographical information can be found at: http://members.shaw.ca/nick.steeves under the "about me" section. KDE-3.3.1 should be ready by Fri 15 Oct 2004 09:00. Unfortunately, I haven't had the chance to gain any CVS experience yet. Sincerely, Nick PS: I've already subscribed to CLC-devel. As you are opting me in, I would appreciate if you would forward this email to the appropriate mailing list. On September 22, 2004 9:28, you wrote:
Hi Nick,
I've seen a lot of your ports and they (mostly ;-) fit to our CLC port rules. Would you be interested to become a CLC maintainer ?
I'd be happy to get some more help with KDE.
bye, danm
[1] http://clc.morpheus.net:6999/clc/wiki?p=MaintainerGuidelines
Hi, On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 11:43:38 +0200, Daniel Mueller wrote:
Hi,
some time ago I've asked Nick Steevens whether he would like to become a CLC maintainer and join our team. He has a bunch of nice ports located here: http://members.shaw.ca/nick.steeves/ports/index.html I've had some contact with Nick in the past (mostly about 'htup', Nick's httpup repository upload-sync tool) and think that would fit well in our team.
The main reason why I've wrote him was that he could be a big help with KDE packages/ports (maybe he could overtake it completely..). He sent me a lot of patches and suggestions so far and I adopted nearly all of them. Sounds great. Both KDE and GNOME are so large that it's a good idea to split the work (unless you have such workaholics like rrm3 and jaeger :-) [Note: this is meant as a compliment]).
The few ports I checked look fine, I just saw some "Depends: kdelibs, kdebase" from time to time, which could be reduced since kdebase depends on libs... :-)
Needless to say that I vote for his CLC membership :) So do I.
Kind regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Bern, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net
Hi, are there any other comments to this subject ? We have two 'Yes to membership' so far. On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:55:55 -0600 Nick Steeves <Nick.Steeves@shaw.ca> wrote:
Hi,
How is the maintainer application process going? CLC-devel seems rather quiet...
Cheers, Nick
bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany (OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A)
On 31/10/2004 01:02 Daniel Mueller wrote:
Hi,
are there any other comments to this subject ? We have two 'Yes to membership' so far.
Hi, I never had any contact with nick, but I guess a couple of supporters are enough to welcome Nick into CLC. And he appears to like the Alloy KDE style, so he MUST be good ;-) Regards, Simone -- Simone Rota WEB : http://www.varlock.com Bergamo, Italy MAIL: sip@varlock.com
On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 01:02 +0200, Daniel Mueller wrote:
are there any other comments to this subject ? We have two 'Yes to membership' so far.
I'm sorry, I thought I had replied to this already, guess I was mistaken. I vote yes as well, seems good to me. Matt (jaeger@freenode/#crux) -- Matt Housh (jaeger@morpheus.net) - Morpheus.Net Co-Founder/Administrator
--- Matt Housh <jaeger@morpheus.net> wrote:
I'm sorry, I thought I had replied to this already, guess I was mistaken. I vote yes as well, seems good to me.
Matt (jaeger@freenode/#crux)
I've not had much interaction with Nick, and so I'll not vote one way or the other - but will trust you guys to do so. ===== Jay Dolan Software Engineer, Systems Analyst Windmill Cycles, Inc. 508.999.4000 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
participants (5)
-
Daniel Mueller
-
Jay Dolan
-
Johannes Winkelmann
-
Matt Housh
-
Simone Rota