Hi everybody, results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at http://www.varlock.com/build Hope it's useful. I plan to do a partial build (only failed ports) within a couple of days. Regards, Simone
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Simone Rota wrote:
Hi everybody,
results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at
Great work! Some notes: - wireless-tools, wvdial, pptp-linux and rp-pppoe has _not_ been added to opt, so please keep them in contrib. I simply grab the latest version of them from contrib when I create an ISO. - contrib/libidl2 could be removde since opt/libidl in 1.3 has been upgraded to 0.8.2. - pptp should be removed, since it's a duplicate of pptp-linux. - Where the hell are those pictures! ;) /Per
* Per Liden <per@fukt.bth.se> [031204 03:14]: Hi,
- pptp should be removed, since it's a duplicate of pptp-linux.
I'm sorry. I wanted to fix this, but I've no SSH-access at the moment because of the wrong ssh-key in CLC's authorized_keys. I still try to reach obbl to fix this.
- Where the hell are those pictures! ;)
Which pictures? best regards, daniel -- Daniel K. Gebhart http://dkg.con-fuse.org/ Institute for Computer Science University of Innsbruck Fon: (office): +43 512 507 6444 Mail: <daniel.gebhart(at)uibk.ac.at>
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Simone Rota wrote:
Hi everybody,
Hi maintainers,
results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at
Hope it's useful.
Great work!
I plan to do a partial build (only failed ports) within a couple of days.
I just updated my personal machine at work to 1.3 and will check my failed ports the whole day... thanks for your build Martin -- martin opel / fachbereich informatik - fachhochschule regensburg / email: martin.opel@informatik.fh-regensburg.de / web: http://rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de/~opel/ / phone: +49 941 943-1336, fax: +49 941 943-1426
Hi Simone, On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 20:35:40 +0100, Simone Rota wrote:
Hi everybody,
results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at
Hope it's useful. It's just great! Thanks a lot. I have tagged my ports for 1.3 now (of course only those which built... looking into the rest now).
Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Biel, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 20:35:40 +0100, Simone Rota wrote:
Hi everybody,
results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at
Hope it's useful.
Sorry, my mailserver was down and I missed some postings. Anyway, the reason POSTFIX failed was because you didn't have postdrop group. Sorry, no way to automate it without have pre/post install scripts. Postfix requires a special group so no way around this. The failure, as you can see in the log, was due to mistmatch of footprint files that setgid postdrop. Victor
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Victor wrote: I tagged all my ports CONTRIB-1_3. The reason for the failure of nearly all ports was the dependency to libsdl. qmail did not build for the same reason as postfix: missing user accounts. Thanks again for your build script. It saved a lot work. Bye Martin -- martin opel / fachbereich informatik - fachhochschule regensburg / email: martin.opel@informatik.fh-regensburg.de / web: http://rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de/~opel/
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Victor wrote: [...]
Sorry, my mailserver was down and I missed some postings. Anyway, the reason POSTFIX failed was because you didn't have postdrop group. Sorry, no way to automate it without have pre/post install scripts. Postfix requires a special group so no way around this. The failure, as you can see in the log, was due to mistmatch of footprint files that setgid postdrop.
Can't the existing "mail" group be used instead of "postdrop"? /Per
Per Liden wrote:
Can't the existing "mail" group be used instead of "postdrop"?
No. Postfix already runs as user mail, which in group mail. Postdrop must be a group of which the user that postfix runs as is NOT a member. From INSTALL: - Create a group "postdrop" with a group id that is not used by any other user account. Not even by the postfix user account. I think this is done for security so only the setgid postdrop program can write. Since CRUX doesn't have a dedicated postfix user, using mail group is not wise according to install docs.
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Victor wrote:
Per Liden wrote:
Can't the existing "mail" group be used instead of "postdrop"?
No. Postfix already runs as user mail, which in group mail. Postdrop must be a group of which the user that postfix runs as is NOT a member.
From INSTALL:
- Create a group "postdrop" with a group id that is not used by any other user account. Not even by the postfix user account.
I think this is done for security so only the setgid postdrop program can write. Since CRUX doesn't have a dedicated postfix user, using mail group is not wise according to install docs.
I see, thanks. /Per
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 20:35, Simone Rota wrote:
Hi everybody,
results and first comments on the automated build process of CLC contrib ports are available at
Hope it's useful.
Hi again, [I've been quite busy during the last 2 days; this auto-reply is a pathetic attempt to sum up the replies I couldn't write.] I'm glad someone found the provided info useful, thanks to all the ones wo gave me hints and opinions. As soon as CRUX 1.3 becomes official and we have most (all?) of the ports tagged CONTRIB-1_3 I'll make a complete build of the clc ports. (sorry, for the moment I have no time to do another "pre-release" build). As stated on the url above, these builds are something experimental for the moment, it is my intention to improve th building process a bit and make it a regular/periodic thing. As usual, don't take my words too seriuosly, I'm not the busiest person in the word, but I'm sure I'm one of the less organized :-) Regards, Simone
As soon as CRUX 1.3 becomes official and we have most (all?) of the ports tagged CONTRIB-1_3 I'll make a complete build of the clc ports. (sorry, for the moment I have no time to do another "pre-release" build).
Since Simone does not have time to do another build, does someone with 1.3-test1 think they could try to install my packages again? I'm pretty sure they all work fine, now. xdaliclock - Was mis-tagged (ugh) sodipodi - Was depending on libxml, should have been libxml2
As soon as CRUX 1.3 becomes official and we have most (all?) of the ports tagged CONTRIB-1_3 I'll make a complete build of the clc ports. (sorry, for the moment I have no time to do another "pre-release" build).
Since Simone does not have time to do another build, does someone with 1.3-test1 think they could try to install my packages again? I'm pretty sure they all work fine, now. xdaliclock - Was mis-tagged (ugh) sodipodi - Was depending on libxml, should have been libxml2 gkrellflynn - Md5sum was wrong electricsheep - Python was broken before expect - Also python sdl_net - libsdl Sorry about the incomplete email spam :D If someone has a chance just to test these ones and let me know the results, that'd be so great. Logan
Logan Ingalls <log@plutor.org> [2003-12-06 15:28]:
Since Simone does not have time to do another build, does someone with 1.3-test1 think they could try to install my packages again? I'm pretty sure they all work fine, now.
xdaliclock - Was mis-tagged (ugh) sodipodi - Was depending on libxml, should have been libxml2 gkrellflynn - Md5sum was wrong
These build cleanly.
electricsheep - Python was broken before expect - Also python sdl_net - libsdl
I didn't test those. -- Regards, Tilman
participants (8)
-
Daniel K. Gebhart -
Johannes Winkelmann -
Logan Ingalls -
Martin Opel -
Per Liden -
Simone Rota -
Tilman Sauerbeck -
Victor