Hi all, as of version 1.2.2 core/nfs-utils depends on opt/libcap, I've overseen this new dependency and committed the update, sorry for that. This issue has been reported [1], the corresponding commit to nfs-utils is here [2]. We have at least three options now: a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1 b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core c) move nfs-utils from core to opt I tend towards b) because the new version comes with a lot of fixes and improvements [3] and most users might have libcap installed anyway, it's part of our ISO and cdrkit depends on it. Opinions? Thanks and best regards Juergen [1] http://crux.nu/bugs/?do=details&task_id=564 [2] http://tinyurl.com/yh4wqlg [3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfsv4/11304 -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:28:56 +0100 Juergen Daubert <jue@jue.li> wrote:
Hi all,
as of version 1.2.2 core/nfs-utils depends on opt/libcap, I've overseen this new dependency and committed the update, sorry for that. This issue has been reported [1], the corresponding commit to nfs-utils is here [2].
We have at least three options now: a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1 b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core c) move nfs-utils from core to opt
I tend towards b) because the new version comes with a lot of fixes and improvements [3] and most users might have libcap installed anyway, it's part of our ISO and cdrkit depends on it.
Opinions?
in my humble opinion, i'm for option (c). It's the simplest way to solve this problem. nfs-utils are usefull only in particular scenarios anyway it must remain available into installation ISO. thanks for your hard work, --nico -- acrux <acrux_it@libero.it>
* acrux (acrux_it@libero.it) wrote:
Opinions?
in my humble opinion, i'm for option (c). It's the simplest way to solve this problem. nfs-utils are usefull only in particular scenarios anyway it must remain available into installation ISO.
+1 regards, Thomas Penteker -- Program load too heavy for processor to lift.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 09:57:28PM -0600, Matt Housh wrote:
On 2/24/2010 04:28, Juergen Daubert wrote: [...]
We have at least three options now: a) downgrade nfs-utils to 1.2.1 b) move libcap and libattr from opt to core c) move nfs-utils from core to opt
For what it's worth, I like option c as well.
Thanks for all responses, looks like c) is the way to go, which is ok for me as well. If we take NFSv4-support into consideration moving to opt is certainly the best way, because that will add further dependencies. Greetings Juergen -- Juergen Daubert | mailto:jue@jue.li Korb, Germany | http://jue.li/crux
participants (4)
-
acrux -
Juergen Daubert -
Matt Housh -
Thomas Penteker