- crux64 - lists.crux.nu

[Clc-crux64] nvidia driver
by Tomas Lindquist Olsen 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

Hi. There is a newer release of the nvidia driver available. pkg2 instead of pkg0 I have attached two files, * a patch for the Pkgfile of the opt/nvidia port (very trivial) * a nvidia32 port for 32 bit emulation accelerated OpenGL support I don't have access to a proper host right now, so I can't set up a httpup rep for them, and I think they should be added to the main tree anyway. I hope you agree. -Tomas

2 1

[Clc-crux64] thanx
by Tomas Lindquist Olsen 11 Feb '06

11 Feb '06

I just want to say thanx for making this 64bit version of CRUX. CRUX is my alltime favorite Linux distro, and I'm very happy that I can continue to use CRUX now that I've bought myself a athlon64x2 I have one question. How come not all the 64bit ports from 2.1 is in 2.1.1 ? (xchat for example) -Tomas

2 2

[Clc-crux64] Announcement CRUX 2.1.1-64bit-rc2
by Daniel Mueller 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hello, I transfered the second release candidate of CRUX 2.1.1-64bit[1] to crux.danm.de yesterday. Changes: ======== - Libidn moved from opt to core (thanks Terry), - grub's xfs problem solved (thanks Matt), - some port updates and - the boot image uses syslinux 3.09 (instead of 3.11) again. I've tested the following systems so far: 64bit (Intel EMT64/AMD64) ========================= o Fujitsu Siemens Computers Scenic W620 i915G (Intel P4 64bit) => ISO booted successfully. o Fujitsu Siemens Computers SCALEO P (Athlon64 3700+) => ISO booted successfully. o HP Proliant DL360 G4(Intel P4 64bit) with Smart Array 6i (SCSI RAID1) => ISO booted successfully, all RAIDs were detected and were accessible. I had loved to test more server machines but this small flounder was the only one lying around. 32bit (Intel) ;-) ================= o Fujitsu Siemens Computers Lifebook S4572 (Intel PIII 750) => After pressing F12 for choosing CD as primary boot device the bootloader "isolinux" started. Of course, CRUX could not boot (Kernel said: "Use a 32bit distribution"). I only wanted to see whether isolinux shows up. bye, danm [1] http://crux.danm.de/files/iso/2.1.1-64bit/ -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A

3 5

[Clc-crux64] Bugs in 32-bit-code.
by Jan Pålsson 01 Feb '06

01 Feb '06

Hi. Q1. Does anyone know if the new rc1 will compile libast and run eterm without flaws? I had it compiled but it looks like crap. Q2. Has anyone managed to run GtkRadiant ( http://www.qeradiant.com/ ) on an AMD64? Cheers. Jan

2 1

[Clc-crux64] Announcement CRUX 2.1.1-64bit-rc1
by Daniel Mueller 30 Jan '06

30 Jan '06

Hello, the first release candidate of CRUX 2.1.1-64bit is ready and available for download. http://crux.danm.de/files/iso/2.1.1-64bit/ Most significant changes are: - glibc 2.3.6 with AMD64 patches and linuxthreads + native posix threads. NPTL libraries are placed in /lib64/tls and /usr/lib64/tls. - gcc 4.0.2 - x11 6.9.0 - pkgutils with 64bit enhancements - No conflicting compat32/core/opt ports anymore. If you want the 32bit version of firefox you have to install both, core/firefox and compat32/firefox32. Both ports share arch-independent files (/usr/share, /usr/include, ..). 32bit applications usually have '32' as suffix (firefox32,mplayer32,..) An upgrade from CRUX-2.1-gcc4-head to CRUX 2.1.1 seems to be flawlessly feasible - at least it worked well for me :-). Don't forget to deinstall nvidia before - and - replace your old /etc/pkgmk.conf with the newer one found in /var/lib/pkg/rejected/etc/ after the update. No application recompilations were needed because the *-HEAD ISO was delivered with gcc4. If you create your own 32bit ports have a look at /etc/pkgmk.conf. You can specify a 32bit architecture with 'arch=xxx'. An example: [..] name=flex32 version=2.5.31 release=2 arch=i686 [..] If you have any questions please use this (public) mailinglist. Have a nice evening, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A

2 3

Re: [Clc-crux64] Upgrades
by Daniel Mueller 16 Jan '06

16 Jan '06

Ron, your ISP sucks: <xxxxxxxx(a)verizon.net>: host relay.verizon.net[206.46.232.11] said: 550 Email from your Email Service Provider is currently blocked by Verizon Online's anti-spam system. The email "sender" or Email Service Provider may visit http://www.verizon.net/whitelist and request removal of the block. (in reply to MAIL FROM command) My host seems to be "clean": http://rbls.org/?q=217.160.166.114 On Monday 16 January 2006 01:19, Ron Young wrote: > I should have made my question clearer. I am using Crux > 64-2.1-gcc4-head-iso. > > But in general if I do a upgrade, that effects the gcc tool chain. Then the > upgrade replaces the base and opt packages. But it is up to me to recompile > all the other effected packages, that I have added. Oh, that are good conditions for an upgrade. The only "big" changes you'll have to keep an eye on are glibc 2.3.6 - which is binary compatible to the old one - and X11R6.9. If you own an nvidia card I highly recommend you to DEINSTALL the nvidia package during CRUX update. Firefox32 depends now on firefox(64bit). Last but not least you should use the newest pkgutils (+ /etc/pkgmk.conf!! -> /var/lib/pkg/rejected/etc/pkgmk.conf) because I put 64/32bit logic in there. I don't think a recompilation of all applications is needed in your case. bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A

1 0

[Clc-crux64] Upgrades
by Ron Young 15 Jan '06

15 Jan '06

Can this iso be used to upgrage the older iso ? Ron Young

2 1

[Clc-crux64] Performance gain?
by Jan Pålsson 15 Jan '06

15 Jan '06

Hi. I've installed Crux64 but theres some programs that i cant use (GtkRadiant for example) I'm thinking of installing avanilla Crux instead. Has anyone done some kind of benchmark compairing Crux64 with a vanilla Crux on the same machine? Is the loss in performance that big? Jan Pålsson aka zlotnik in #crux@freenode

1 0

[Clc-crux64] Status CRUX 2.1.1
by Daniel Mueller 15 Jan '06

15 Jan '06

Hello, for those who are interested in: I'm still working on CRUX 2.1.1 64bit. I came across some problems with glibc and x11 which took me a lot of time. However, here are the key changes so far: - glibc 2.3.6 with linuxthreads AND Native Posix Threads (nptl) linuxthreads -> lib64/*.so nptl -L lib64/tls/*.so I hope I'll get UML-Linux running this time.. - xorg 6.9.0 I got 'segmentation faults' without "-fno-strict-aliasing". If I get any further problems I'll move back to 6.8.2 :-( - gcc 4.0.2 - pkgutils with arch extension (arch=.. in Pkgfile). See [1] for further information. - the ports directory reflects crux.nu's new structure: /usr/ports/{core,opt,contrib,compat32} The ports are not accessable through crux.nu's SVN yet. You can download a tarball here [2]. Have a nice Sunday! bye, danm [1] http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/clc-crux64/2005-December/000171.html [2] http://crux.danm.de/files/stuff/crux-2.1.1-2006-01-15.tar.bz2 -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A

1 0

[Clc-crux64] CRUX64(-danm) and CLC
by Daniel Mueller 28 Dec '05

28 Dec '05

Hi, just for your information: [1] http://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/clc-devel/2005-December/001198.html Upcoming changes: base -> core opt/contrib -> opt compat32 -> compat32 ???? -> contrib * [2] I'm planning to integrate AMD's 64bit glibc-patches and using gcc4 instead of gcc3. Are there any suggestions/"request for enhancements" for the next CRUX64 release? Matt told me that he compilied all packages _without_ -fPIC - anyone who experienced problems with '-fPIC'? What's about the current compat32 ports? Is the directory layout (/lib64, /lib32, ..) okay for all? bye, danm [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.distributions.crux.general/36 -- Daniel Mueller Berlin, Germany OpenPGP: 1024D/E4F4383A

4 12