Hi Jürgen, On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:12:36 +0200, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:25:33AM +0200, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
Hi there,
Hello,
I'll start a separate thread to avoid polluting the "soft-dep" thread. A number of people seem to have rather strong feelings against multilib, however i get the impression that the impact is in fact not that big. To help us with deciding, here's a summary of what I think would be a good approach:
1. core-x86_64/{glibc,gcc,binutils,bin86} multilib
Sorry, I do not understand that glibc part. The 32-bit libs has to be build in a second run anyway IMO, so it should be possible to split them out? Ah, I got that one wrong. So it would be in the compat32 layer too, right?
So do I understand that correctly that it's mainly a question of whether we want a multilib toolchain by default? Thanks, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@smts.ch Zurich, Switzerland http://jw.smts.ch