[Clc-crux64] Is a new iso coming
I wonder if a new iso is coming soon. I'm bringing up a new system and will wait if true. Thanks Ron Young
Hello, I've uploaded my modified version of Jeremy's CRUX x86_64. Of course it is considered unstable.. :-) To sum up the key changes: - /lib is not longer used by any application (lib32/lib64) - devfs has been replaced with udev - native 32bit support - a lot of compat32 (32bit) applications such as x11-32, firefox32 (flash plugin works, acrobat-reader plugin works as well), mplayer32 (win 32bit codecs), [..] If you are brave enough to test it: http://crux.danm.de Remember that it uses UDEV instead of DEVFS -> at the boot command line you have to specify your CDROM-drive like this: IDE cdrom drive (Secondary Master) CRUX root=/dev/hdc irgend SCSI cdrom drive CRUX root=/dev/scd0 Jeremy, I hope we can merge our work somehow. bye, danm -- Daniel Mueller
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:41 +0200, Daniel Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded my modified version of Jeremy's CRUX x86_64. Of course it is considered unstable.. :-)
As was mine... :)
To sum up the key changes:
- /lib is not longer used by any application (lib32/lib64) - devfs has been replaced with udev - native 32bit support - a lot of compat32 (32bit) applications such as x11-32, firefox32 (flash plugin works, acrobat-reader plugin works as well), mplayer32 (win 32bit codecs), [..]
If you are brave enough to test it:
I'll be giving it a shot next week.
Remember that it uses UDEV instead of DEVFS -> at the boot command line you have to specify your CDROM-drive like this:
IDE cdrom drive (Secondary Master) CRUX root=/dev/hdc irgend SCSI cdrom drive CRUX root=/dev/scd0
Jeremy, I hope we can merge our work somehow.
Yes, let's. Unfortunately, I'm right in the middle of packing my house/kids/wife to move them 2000 miles to the east -- start a new job next Tuesday. That being said, I probably won't be doing much of anything else for a little while. Jeremy
Daniel Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded my modified version of Jeremy's CRUX x86_64. Of course it is considered unstable.. :-)
I'm using yours on my SN95G5 now, it seems to work fine so far except for one thing. I haven't had the time to look into this yet, but udevinfo doesn't work correctly. So in order to create some static device naming rules I had to dig through /sys instead of just running udevinfo. Matt
participants (4)
-
Daniel Mueller -
Jeremy Jones -
Matt Housh -
Ron Young