11 Mar
2006
11 Mar
'06
4:40 p.m.
On Saturday 11 March 2006 14:44, Juergen Daubert wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 12:35:19PM +0100, Johannes Winkelmann wrote:
[...]
However, from your report (and the ChangeLog for 4.1) updating between releases sounds quite feasible, so if we manage to get out 2.2 soon, I'd prefer to keep 4.0.x, and update to 4.1.1 or 4.1.2 through ports once they're available.
I second that. Though we should use 4.0.3, which is already tagged in gcc-svn [1]. I guess it's available within some days as an tarball.
It's already available, I've been rebuilding for some hours now. Maybe it just hasn't hit you mirror yet? In any case, I fully support Johannes' suggested upgrade path.