![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2b7c3ff547b7d8e868b327eb5d88e72e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote: |On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso <sdaoden@yandex.com> |wrote: |> The first version missed HAVE_GETDTABLESIZE and HAVE_IOPRIO_SET so |> it was not enough indeed. |> Find attached a compressed git(1) format-patch, the nm(1) output |> of the compiled result is "identical" to that of the version i got |> from following the dpkg recipe of yours. |> And i have registered at the Debian Package Tracker and subscribed |> to dpkg updates, which makes me hope i get notifications on |> release updates? Is that enough? | |This should probably go in out repo(s) somewhere |perhaps our "tools" repo? Mabe fork/branch from dpkg |and rebase on new changes (without the rest of dpkg)? It doesn't seem to be a wild guess to say that further maintenance shouldn't be a real burden... (The 1.17.24 version is identical to what was in 1.17.23, for example.) I'm fine with whatever you wanna do, but willing to help with this as necessary. --steffen