![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/2b7c3ff547b7d8e868b327eb5d88e72e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Juergen Daubert <jue@jue.li> wrote: |On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 07:53:54PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |>|Quoting Alan Mizrahi <alan+crux@mizrahi.com.ve>: |>|> So we have two options: |>|> 1. Start writing init scripts properly |>|> 2. Start using start-stop-daemon |> I haven't actually tried it yet, but i gave it a fivteen minute |> quick shot and could compile only start-stop-daemon.c on Crux 3.1 |> by applying the attached hacky diff. Doing something a little bit |> more sane shouldn't cause that much worries given that both Debian |> and Crux are Linux. |> Unless the plan is to use more tools from dpkg, of course... | |no, nothing planned in that direction. | |Steffen, thanks for your offer to maintain something that allows us |to build start-stop-daemon without downloading the whole dpkg sources. |If you have a final patch let's talk about the best method to maintain |it. With pleasure, i like CRUX! The first version missed HAVE_GETDTABLESIZE and HAVE_IOPRIO_SET so it was not enough indeed. Find attached a compressed git(1) format-patch, the nm(1) output of the compiled result is "identical" to that of the version i got from following the dpkg recipe of yours. And i have registered at the Debian Package Tracker and subscribed to dpkg updates, which makes me hope i get notifications on release updates? Is that enough? Ciao, --steffen