On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:56:50 +0200, Mark Rosenstand wrote:
Hello, Mark!
IMO, the distro can be called CRUX, but anyway it is still GNU/Linux [...] Basically for me, I agree with Stallman and call distro either CRUX or CRUX GNU/Linux where acceptable. We had that discussion here before, and after it everyone still had the same opinion, so please let's not repeat it again (or if you must,
Hi, On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:52:23 +0200, Oleksiy V. Khilkevich wrote: please do it elsewhere). Howver, here's a historical note for those interested: If you go back to this discussion you'll see that some prominent current and former developers of CRUX disagree with calling it GNU/Linux, 'GNU/Linux distribution' or even 'CRUX GNU/Linux' (me included). Rather, they prefer 'CRUX', and 'CRUX' is a 'linux distribution', since it reflects our perception of free software as used in the CRUX project better. However, everyone I talked to very much respects the freedom of speech and freedom and thought of others, and we in no way mean to force any opinion on you. If you prefer calling it GNU/Linux, please feel free to continue doing so; I hope those who disagree with our choice value our freedoms just as much. Best regards, Johannes -- Johannes Winkelmann mailto:jw@tks6.net Zurich, Switzerland http://jw.tks6.net