On 10/05/06 13:04 Anselm R. Garbe wrote: Hi,
Last thing for this mail: Simone, did you continued the uCRUX development?
Not in the form of a full CRUX port. I've been working on an uclibc based CRUX lookalike for my job lately, specifically intended for booting from usb/CF/SD. Since we aimed for a compact setup, we simply used busybox and added the very few packages (<10) we needed.
I tried to build a linux from scratch using a uclibc toolchain, and it got quite far (I even compile X11R7.1 with uClibc, some ioctl-related issues needed to be patched) - but I'm not sure it is a good idea to enforce everything to use a non-glibc environment, that's why I ask if some other would like to see such development that those tools which compile fine use a C library with at least clutter as possible.
I came to the conclusion that for my current needings a complete uclibc port of CRUX would be overkill, but I'm sure there are other people interested in it out there. -- Simone Rota Bergamo, Italy - http://www.varlock.com