James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:
 |On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso <sdaoden@yandex.com>
 |wrote:

 |> The first version missed HAVE_GETDTABLESIZE and HAVE_IOPRIO_SET so
 |> it was not enough indeed.
 |> Find attached a compressed git(1) format-patch, the nm(1) output
 |> of the compiled result is "identical" to that of the version i got
 |> from following the dpkg recipe of yours.
 |> And i have registered at the Debian Package Tracker and subscribed
 |> to dpkg updates, which makes me hope i get notifications on
 |> release updates?  Is that enough?
 |
 |This should probably go in out repo(s) somewhere
 |perhaps our "tools" repo? Mabe fork/branch from dpkg
 |and rebase on new changes (without the rest of dpkg)?

It doesn't seem to be a wild guess to say that further maintenance
shouldn't be a real burden...  (The 1.17.24 version is identical
to what was in 1.17.23, for example.)  I'm fine with whatever you
wanna do, but willing to help with this as necessary.

--steffen

_______________________________________________
CRUX mailing list
CRUX@lists.crux.nu
https://lists.crux.nu/mailman/listinfo/crux